actually, back to philosophy. this time its epistemology. the question is how we define knowledge. plato famously defined knowledge as justified true belief. this means that if someone beleives something, is justified in believing it, and it is true, then they have knowledge of it. this view, unfortunatly, had been acepted until 1963, when edmund gettier refuted and provided situttions in which it is said that the person has justified belief in something, and that thing is true, but it is said that the person does not have knowledge.
its short, and you can read it here: http://www.ditext.com/gettier/gettier.html
i have a few objections. id like to see what other people say first.
the only easy day was yesterday
Shout To...
Tuesday, November 20, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(149)
-
▼
November
(17)
- Inspiration: Aristotle On Friendship
- Intimacy
- Back In Black
- detroit has been named the most dangerous city by ...
- there are a lot of hobos in california. when i see...
- outside the lines
- love
- http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6330009.stmas em...
- i was just watchin a termanology video mike had a ...
- Commitment.
- i paraphraze from a sports center broadcast:'...mr...
- ON THE MORAL LIMITS OF GOVERNMENT: Should Governme...
- Rumors of Their Greatness Have Been Greatly Exagge...
- alright so hear me out. a fast hybrid, like the v6...
- "well, i definatly think im a better person now be...
- its juat dawned on me that professional sports an ...
- I think they call this poetic justice.
-
▼
November
(17)
No comments:
Post a Comment